Bug 203536

Summary: split a -devel package?
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Patrice Dumas <pertusus>
Component: a2psAssignee: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-02-27 18:20:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 150225, 225235    

Description Patrice Dumas 2006-08-22 11:45:43 UTC
Description of problem:

the a2ps package contains a library and an include file, it should
better be in a -devel package. 

The .la file is uneeded, it should be removed, as per the 
packaging guidelines.

having ogonkify included in a2ps is bad, since it is the 
same than ogonkify upstream with configure.in added, but
it may not be worth the trouble to remove it, since the
2 projects seem to work together.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2006-11-17 15:48:40 UTC
Maybe it is the right time to move
/usr/include/liba2ps.h
/usr/lib/liba2ps.a

and remove
/usr/lib/liba2ps.la

such that it leaves time to workaround things that break?

Comment 2 Tim Waugh 2007-02-27 18:01:44 UTC
Actually I don't think we need to keep those files around at all.

Fixed in CVS.

Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2007-02-27 18:20:17 UTC
Seems fine. They could be re-added later if needed anyway.
I close rawhide, feel free to reopen and reclose if you think
there is a better resolution.