Bug 2035398

Summary:	Please add llvm-devel to all arches in RHEL9
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9	Reporter:	Troy Dawson <tdawson>
Component:	llvm	Assignee:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Jesus Checa <jchecahi>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	CentOS Stream	CC:	bstinson, jchecahi, jwboyer, mattias.ellert, mprchlik, sguelton, tschelle
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Bugfix, Triaged
Target Release:	---	Flags:	pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	llvm-devel-13.0.0-1.el9	Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-05-17 13:02:31 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Deadline:	2022-02-14

Description Troy Dawson 2021-12-23 21:44:09 UTC

I am building the KDE Plasma desktop in EPEL9.  A couple packages require llvm-devel to build.

Currently in RHEL9 llvm-devel is missing on s390x.  llvm is available on all the architectures, it's just the -devel package that is missing on s390x.

For me, it's only affecting qt-creator and umbrello, which are not critical KDE packages.  But I suspect that many other EPEL packages are going to hit the same problem.

I checked the latest production compose - CentOS-Stream-9-20211222.0
and latest development compose - CentOS-Stream-9-20211223.d.0

Comment 1 Tom Stellard 2021-12-24 03:16:14 UTC

The package exists in koji.  Is it possible the compose is filtering it out?

Comment 2 Troy Dawson 2021-12-24 06:19:42 UTC

I believe instead of being filtered out, it is not being pulled in.
If you look at pungi-centos/prepopulate.json it shows
        "llvm-devel.aarch64", 
        "llvm-devel.ppc64le", 
        "llvm-devel.i686", 
        "llvm-devel.x86_64", 

I don't know why we aren't prepopulating llvm-devel for s390x.
There might be a reason, or it might be an oversight.

Also, this isn't urgent.  I don't want to disturb anyones Holidays or shutdowns.  I just wanted to get this bug created before I took my holidays.  We can talk about it next year.  Happy Holidays.

Comment 3 Josh Boyer 2022-01-04 12:45:39 UTC

(In reply to Troy Dawson from comment #2)
> I believe instead of being filtered out, it is not being pulled in.
> If you look at pungi-centos/prepopulate.json it shows
>         "llvm-devel.aarch64", 
>         "llvm-devel.ppc64le", 
>         "llvm-devel.i686", 
>         "llvm-devel.x86_64", 
> 
> I don't know why we aren't prepopulating llvm-devel for s390x.
> There might be a reason, or it might be an oversight.

prepopulate.json was generated from a point-in-time compose to set a baseline post-RHEL 9 Beta.  At that time, llvm-devel.s390x wasn't included.

It's a case of "not being pulled in", essentially.  The only thing that pulls it into the compose on the other arches is lld-test.  lld isn't built for s390x at all, so llvm-devel isn't pulled in.

Adding llvm-devel to s390x is simple to do, after the bug is approved.

Comment 4 Tom Stellard 2022-01-05 05:30:14 UTC

*** Bug 2034903 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Tom Stellard 2022-01-05 05:32:22 UTC

@jwboyer Should I assign this to you?

Comment 7 Josh Boyer 2022-01-05 13:34:02 UTC

Sure

Comment 8 Josh Boyer 2022-01-05 13:36:07 UTC

https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/release-engineering/pungi-centos/-/merge_requests/229

Comment 15 Troy Dawson 2022-01-12 14:35:05 UTC

I just want to chime in and say I'm now seeing llvm-devel on all arches on my EPEL9 builds.
Thank You.

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-17 13:02:31 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (new packages: llvm-toolset), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:2442