Bug 203565

Summary:	split out kpathsea devel + moves from tetex-fonts?
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Patrice Dumas <pertusus>
Component:	tetex	Assignee:	Jindrich Novy <jnovy>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	pknirsch
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-12-09 13:49:29 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Patrice Dumas 2006-08-22 14:33:10 UTC

Description of problem:

the kpathsea include files and libkpathsea.a should certainly be
in their own package, which could be named, for example 
kpathsea-devel. Having this library mixed with fonts is in my 
opinion quite messy.

It is not obvious where the kpathsea.info and web2c.info info
pages should go, but maybe they could be better in tetex-doc
or tetex. It's not obvious, though. 

the k* and texhash programs could also be in tetex, but it's 
also debatable, I guess. Indeed it could be cleaner to 
have only things related to fonts in tetex-fonts, and no generally
usefull stuff. Not a big deal.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2006-11-19 18:33:19 UTC

These issues are still relevant, but maybe it is not worth
fixing them in tetex given that we are switching to texlive?
This should be taken into account in the texlive packaging,
but since I guess it'll go through a formal review those kind
of issue will certainly be spotted and debated.

Comment 2 Jindrich Novy 2007-06-11 14:36:52 UTC

The new TeXLive packages the kpathsea-devel separately. It is now under review.

For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureTexLive

Comment 3 Jindrich Novy 2007-12-09 13:49:29 UTC

This is now fixed in rawhide as tetex was replaced by texlive recently.