Bug 203573
Summary: | Do not ship libscrollkeeper.a or libscrollkeeper.so | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Patrice Dumas <pertusus> |
Component: | scrollkeeper | Assignee: | Matthew Barnes <mbarnes> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | scrollkeeper-0.3.14-9.fc7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-10-31 03:04:14 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Patrice Dumas
2006-08-22 14:58:21 UTC
It looks like some of the scrollkeeper utilities dynamically link to libscrollkeeper.so.0. $ ldd /usr/bin/scrollkeeper* | grep scrollkeeper Does that not mean the .so needs to be packaged with the binaries? I agree that I don't see much point in shipping libscrollkeeper.a. Indeed, but not against the /usr/lib/libscrollkeeper.so link. It is only needed at build time, so should be in -devel. If all that links against libscrollkeeper is in the scrollkeeper source package then the .so is no needed for them. And the lack of headers certainly shows that it is not meant to be linked against by programs outside of the scrollkeeper package itself. Ah, I see. Indeed there seems to be no packages requiring the .so or .a. $ repoquery --whatrequires libscrollkeeper.a $ repoquery --whatrequires libscrollkeeper.so $ repoquery --whatrequires libscrollkeeper.so.0 scrollkeeper-0:0.3.14-8.fc6.i386 So a -devel package does not make sense. I think I'd prefer to just not ship those files. Changing the summary appropriately. Fixed in scrollkeeper-0.3.14-9.fc7. |