Bug 2035836

Summary:	Please build ode for EPEL 8
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Scott K Logan <logans>
Component:	ode	Assignee:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	39	CC:	hdegoede
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Scott K Logan 2021-12-28 00:44:58 UTC

Description of problem:
There is no build of ode for EPEL 8. Please branch and build ode for EPEL 8.

Additional info:
If maintenance and/or testing of the EPEL packages is a concern, please consider adding me (cottsay) as an EPEL-only co-maintainer on this package. I'm specifically interested in EPEL 8, but the rawhide branch of this package builds cleanly against both EPEL 7 and 8.

Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80545898
Related docs: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/

Comment 1 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 21:18:48 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 2 Scott K Logan 2022-02-14 22:43:38 UTC

Hello Hans, is there anything I can do to help move this along?

Thanks!

Comment 3 Hans de Goede 2022-02-15 13:42:49 UTC

Hi Scott,

Sorry I don't have time to maintain EPEL packages, but I do always welcome co-maintainers who want to do so.

With ode there is an added complication though, ode really needs to be updated to the latest upstream in Fedora first, followed by rebuilding + testing the couple of packages which use ode.

Regards,

Hans

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2022-08-09 13:12:23 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 37 development cycle.
Changing version to 37.

Comment 5 Scott K Logan 2023-03-13 22:58:14 UTC

Hi Hans -

It looks like this package was updated in rawhide.

If you're still unable to maintain additional EPEL branches, I'd like to volunteer to bring up EPEL 8 and EPEL 9 builds.

Thanks,

--scott

Comment 6 Hans de Goede 2023-03-20 15:54:55 UTC

(In reply to Scott K Logan from comment #5)
> Hi Hans -
> 
> It looks like this package was updated in rawhide.
> 
> If you're still unable to maintain additional EPEL branches, I'd like to
> volunteer to bring up EPEL 8 and EPEL 9 builds.

Thank you for the offer, I have made you a co-admin now so that you can bring up EPEL 8 and EPEL 9 builds.

Note in preparation of this I have just bumped the ode version in rawhide from 0.16.2 to 0.16.3, please make sure that you base your EPEL work on the latest rawhide .spec (so on 0.16.3).

Comment 7 Fedora Release Engineering 2023-08-16 07:05:06 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 39 development cycle.
Changing version to 39.