Bug 2035913

Summary:	Please build mod_authnz_external for EPEL 9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	mod_authnz_external	Assignee:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	paul.wouters, philipp, rdieter
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	mod_authnz_external-3.3.3-4.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-04-08 20:53:07 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2035914
Bug Blocks:

Description Robert Scheck 2021-12-28 13:59:07 UTC

Description of problem:
Please build mod_authnz_external for EPEL 9.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mod_authnz_external-3.3.3-3.fc35

Actual results:
No mod_authnz_external in EPEL 9.

Expected results:
mod_authnz_external-3.3.3-3.el9 or better ;-)

Additional info:
Please let me know if you are not interested in maintaining the package on EPEL 9 branch.

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2022-03-26 21:15:07 UTC

Philipp, if you are not interested in maintaining this package for EPEL, may I kindly ask you to add me as co-maintainer (FAS: robert), please?

Comment 2 Philip Prindeville 2022-03-27 02:26:40 UTC

(In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #1)
> Philipp, if you are not interested in maintaining this package for EPEL, may
> I kindly ask you to add me as co-maintainer (FAS: robert), please?

What's involved in adding a co-maintainer?  I've not had to do that in more than a decade...

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2022-03-29 20:48:32 UTC

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb#How_do_I_give_a_user_commit_access_to_a_dist-git_repo.3F describes the current process - does this help you? Just let me know if you have further questions.

Comment 4 Philip Prindeville 2022-03-29 21:42:41 UTC

(In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #1)
> Philipp, if you are not interested in maintaining this package for EPEL, may
> I kindly ask you to add me as co-maintainer (FAS: robert), please?

Done.

Comment 5 Robert Scheck 2022-03-29 22:21:22 UTC

Thank you. I've filed https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43267 for EPEL 9.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-03-31 18:41:13 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7f979fa139 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7f979fa139

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-04-01 17:21:30 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7f979fa139 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7f979fa139

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-04-08 20:53:07 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7f979fa139 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.