Bug 203757
Summary: | Strange grammer in TPS Config info dialog | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Suzanne Hillman <shillman> |
Component: | esc | Assignee: | Jack Magne <jmagne> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.0 | CC: | ckannan, rrelyea |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | RHEL5.0NACK | ||
Fixed In Version: | RHBA-2007-0634 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-11-07 16:57:28 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 202042 |
Description
Suzanne Hillman
2006-08-23 16:28:53 UTC
changing owner to jmagne. Also, "knows nothing about" isn't informative. Do we mean "which does not respond to our ATR commands", or "does not contain a configuration URL"? Or something else? Let's find a good balance between meaningless and over-the-top geeky, but err on the side of well-written geeky. :-) Bob: Excellent point; I agree completely. But if it says the former, ATR needs to be explained (as I, at least, have no idea what that means). Made change to the working of this dialog in build esc-1.0.0-11. Still want to go back and double check it. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for inclusion. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for inclusion. per SSO bug council on 11/17, we will target this for rhel 5.0 release candidates. this is not a blocker. Jack to mark this bug modified. He believes this is already fixed. This bug was proposed for RHEL 5, but wasn't resolved in time. I am proposing this issue to RHEL 5.1. per the last bug meeting, we decided this would be targeted in the rhel 5.1 release. This bug was proposed for RHEL 5, but wasn't resolved in time. devel_ack+ for RHEL 5.1. The new text that has been in for a while is the following: Before you can use this smart card, you need to do two things. First, you need to specify the location (URL) of the smart card server in the text box below. The Smart Card Manager will insert this location onto the smart card. Second, you must format it from the main Smart Card Manager window. Fixed in build esc-1.0.0-21.el5. new text looks fine. Verified on x86_64. rhel5u1 snapshot#2. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0634.html |