Bug 2038607
Summary: | user settings are saved in local storage instead of on cluster | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Christoph Jerolimov <cjerolim> |
Component: | Dev Console | Assignee: | Christoph Jerolimov <cjerolim> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | spathak <spathak> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.8 | CC: | aos-bugs, cjerolim, cvogt, nmukherj, spathak |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.9.z | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
* Before this update, users with restricted access could not access their config map in a shared namespace to save their user settings on a cluster and load them in another browser or machine. As a result, user preferences such as pinned navigation items were only saved in the local browser storage and not shared between multiple browsers. This update resolves the issue: The web console Operator automatically creates role-based access control (RBAC) rules so that each user can save these settings to a config map in a shared namespace and more easily switch between browsers. (link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038607[BZ#2038607])
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 2018234 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2022-01-31 18:22:33 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 2018234 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Comment 2
Christoph Jerolimov
2022-01-24 20:52:18 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.9.18 bug fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:0279 |