Bug 2038786
Summary: | cannot open Packages index using db5 - Resource temporarily unavailable | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Xiaodai Wang <xiaodwan> |
Component: | virt-v2v | Assignee: | Richard W.M. Jones <rjones> |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | tingting zheng <tzheng> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 8.6 | CC: | juzhou, mxie, tyan, tzheng, vwu |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Automation |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-05-05 08:56:43 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Xiaodai Wang
2022-01-10 05:53:14 UTC
I cannot reproduce this bug myself, and I don't understand how NFS could be the cause of this. My attempt to reproduce it was: $ virt-builder rhel-7.1 --format=qcow2 $ scp rhel-7.1.qcow2 nfs-server:/mnt then from another machine which has the nfs server mounted: $ virt-inspector -a /mnt/rhel-7.1.qcow2 However this worked fine. It seems to me most likely that the RPM database in this particular guest is corrupt. (It may not be the __db.* files, it may be the actual database files like Packages etc.) If the guest is bootable, you might try logging into it and doing: rpm --rebuilddb Xiaodai, if this bug happens with RHEL 9 host then I'd like to move it to RHEL 9. For RHEL 8 (since I couldn't reproduce it) I suggest if it only happens in RHEL 8 and NOT in RHEL 9, then we should just close it. If it's not reproducible at all, then also close it. (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #3) > Xiaodai, if this bug happens with RHEL 9 host then I'd like to move it > to RHEL 9. > > For RHEL 8 (since I couldn't reproduce it) I suggest if it only happens > in RHEL 8 and NOT in RHEL 9, then we should just close it. > > If it's not reproducible at all, then also close it. Yes, This issue can not be reproduced in RHEL9. Because it's a minor issue and has a workaround, I agree that we can close it. Thanks. Closing in RHEL 8. If the bug starts happening in RHEL 9, please open a bug about that. |