Bug 2038989

Summary: [RFE] Satellite Security Concerns for Apache
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Jaskaran Singh Narula <janarula>
Component: SecurityAssignee: wclark
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Shweta Singh <shwsingh>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.8.0CC: egolov, ehelms, lzap, mhulan, wpinheir
Target Milestone: 6.12.0Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-11-16 13:33:03 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jaskaran Singh Narula 2022-01-10 17:17:50 UTC 
1. Proposed title of this feature request
[RFE] Satellite Security Concerns for Apache  

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

With the Apache settings following rules should be implemented. Few of them still work if we change but it will get reverted back once the installer will run.

Rules:
----------  
1. httpd service should run with application user id (not root) which has no shell.
2. The permissions of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf file should be set to application ID instead of root. 
3. Apache configuration files document root <Directory> element, must be Options None or Options Multiviews
4. The functionality that supports WebDAV for Apache must be disabled.
----------

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

To enhance security measures with the satellite and capsules.  


4. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)

Installer options might be the best option here. But still, this can be discussed more. 

5. For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.

NA

6. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?
NA

7. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would  they  like  to  target  (i.e.  RHEL5,RHEL6)?

NA
Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2022-03-29 16:04:37 UTC 
Upstream bug assigned to wclark
Comment 4 Bryan Kearney 2022-03-29 16:04:40 UTC 
Upstream bug assigned to wclark
Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2022-04-26 16:04:52 UTC 
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite since the upstream issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/34590 has been resolved.
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2022-11-16 13:33:03 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Satellite 6.12 Release), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8506
Comment 14 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-18 04:30:01 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days