Bug 204056

Summary: Logwatch does not recognise try_tls messages from sendmail
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Saurabh Bathe <sbathe>
Component: logwatchAssignee: Ivana Varekova <varekova>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.4   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0750 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-24 20:01:05 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch for the request against the above mentioned version none

Description Saurabh Bathe 2006-08-25 10:37:03 UTC
Created attachment 134905 [details]
patch for the request against the above mentioned version

Comment 1 Saurabh Bathe 2006-08-25 10:37:03 UTC
Description of problem:
Logwatch does not recognise try_tls messages from sendmail.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
logwatch-5.2.2-1.EL4.1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run logwatch on a maillog file which has try_tls messages.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
The entries are returned as unmatched

Expected results:
Logwatch should ignore them 

Additional info:
I submitted this request upstream and was accepted. Its now in upstream CVS.
But since Red Hat includes a older version, this should be included here also.
Attaching a patch.

Comment 4 Ivana Varekova 2007-10-26 08:57:18 UTC
Putting on the proposed list.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2008-07-24 20:01:05 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0750.html