Bug 2042140
| Summary: | OCS/ODF operator missing from UI | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | swilson | ||||||
| Component: | odf-operator | Assignee: | Nitin Goyal <nigoyal> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Elad <ebenahar> | ||||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
| Version: | 4.9 | CC: | jrivera, muagarwa, ocs-bugs, odf-bz-bot | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2022-01-19 05:21:29 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
swilson
2022-01-18 20:37:35 UTC
Created attachment 1851695 [details]
oc get csv -n openshift-storage
Created attachment 1851708 [details]
'oc get csv -n openshift-storage'
'oc get csv -n openshift-storage'
This is working as expected, we are hiding CSV's in the UI intentionally. I'll also note that the procedure described is incorrect. The upgrade path from OCS 4.8 to ODF 4.9 (there's no such thing as OCS 4.9, from a customer perspective) is to install ODF from Operator Hub. The new odf-operator will take care of upgrading the ocs-operator CSV. Please review the attached picture. If the customer runs `oc get csv -n openshift-storage`, they will see "ocs-operator.v4.9.1" and "odf-operator.v4.9.1". This can be confusing. Will customers need to adjust their Helm charts and YAML manifests within their GitOps workflow to account for the new name? |