Bug 204263
Summary: | Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | hdegoede, wk | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened | ||||
Target Release: | --- | Flags: | kevin:
fedora-cvs+
|
||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-09-01 23:59:07 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 163779, 204598, 204605 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Chitlesh GOORAH
2006-08-27 22:10:03 UTC
*** Bug 177109 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 135122 [details] file lists of geda-symbols First review. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Timestamps - Well, it seems this package has many text files. So preserving timestamps is very desirable. Try to change "make install" option so that (perhaps) most files can keep timestamps. In xscreensaver case (I maintain xscreensaver), I use make INSTALL="install -p" install Check if this package accepts such options, or, if not, change Makefile so that install command is used with -p option. * File and Directory Ownership - %{_datadir}/gEDA/scheme %{gedadocdir}/man I don't know why these empty directories needs to be included in this package. Usually if other packages install some files in these directories, it is the package which should own these directories, not this package. However, * if you aim to sumbit other packages and * the packages install some files in that directories and * the packages surely requires this package, these directories can be owned by this package. Let me know your opinion about these directories. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : okay. 3. Other things I have noticed : - Consider if /usr/share/gEDA/docs can be moved to usual document files' location, i.e. /usr/share/doc/geda-symbols-%{version} - I will attach the file entry of geda-symbols rebuilt in mock. Please check if all files you want to install in this package are correctly packaged. --------------------- BTW, could you review my package (bug 204461) ? Again, this package is aimed for Japanese users...... (In reply to comment #2) > Try to change "make install" option so that (perhaps) > most files can keep timestamps. In xscreensaver case (I maintain > xscreensaver), I use > > make INSTALL="install -p" install > > Check if this package accepts such options, or, if not, It accepts "-p" ::) make INSTALL="install -p" install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} > > * File and Directory Ownership > > - %{_datadir}/gEDA/scheme > %{gedadocdir}/man > > I don't know why these empty directories needs to be > included in this package. > 3. Other things I have noticed : > > > - Consider if /usr/share/gEDA/docs can be moved > to usual document files' location, i.e. > /usr/share/doc/geda-symbols-%{version} > Actually geda-gsymbols are required by geda-gschem geda-gsymcheck geda-doc geda-gattrib geda-gnetlist geda-utils. And all these are required by geda which is a suite. (though i haven't YET included them as Requires in the geda package) Hence these act as a centralised repository for geda. > - I will attach the file entry of geda-symbols rebuilt in > mock. Please check if all files you want to install in > this package are correctly packaged. Yes, everything is included :) luckily Updated: SPEC: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-symbols.spec SRPM: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-symbols-20060123-4.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) > Actually geda-gsymbols are required by geda-gschem geda-gsymcheck geda-doc > geda-gattrib geda-gnetlist geda-utils. > And all these are required by geda which is a suite. (though i haven't YET > included them as Requires in the geda package) > > Hence these act as a centralised repository for geda. > Okay. Now this package is APPROVED by me. Closing as it seems that geda-symbols is released under FE-5, FE6-devel. Well... A problem of owning the directory %{_datadir}/gEDA/bitmap between geda-symbols <-> geda-gsymcheck geda-symbols <-> geda-gschem . I reopen this bug to fix directory owning problem. # geda-symbols is the Owner of the following directories #%dir %{_datadir}/gEDA #%dir %{_datadir}/gEDA/bitmap #%dir %{_datadir}/gEDA/docs #%dir %{_datadir}/gEDA/docs/man #%dir %{_datadir}/gEDA/examples #%dir %{_datadir}/gEDA/scheme fixed. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geda-symbols Short Description: Electronic symbols for gEDA Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 cvs done. |