Bug 204280
Summary: | Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fabio Pedretti <fabio.pedretti> |
Component: | libvorbis | Assignee: | Behdad Esfahbod <behdad> |
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | hdegoede, mattdm |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-10-22 09:31:15 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Fabio Pedretti
2006-08-28 07:51:56 UTC
Fedora Core 5 and Fedora Core 6 are, as we're sure you've noticed, no longer test releases. We're cleaning up the bug database and making sure important bug reports filed against these test releases don't get lost. It would be helpful if you could test this issue with a released version of Fedora or with the latest development / test release. Thanks for your help and for your patience. [This is a bulk message for all open FC5/FC6 test release bugs. I'm adding myself to the CC list for each bug, so I'll see any comments you make after this and do my best to make sure every issue gets proper attention.] Bumping to devel as this still applies to the current libvorbis, I'll contact upstream about this, as I do not know what is wise todo here. Info request files upstream: https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1251 Upstream has pointed me to the logs of this irc meeting: http://people.xiph.org/~giles/2007/200702_meeting.txt Quoting the relevant part: <rillian> xiphmont: can you comment on your interest in merging the aoTuV 1 release into the reference vorbis encoder? <xiphmont> rillian: sure <xiphmont> I would like to do so, honestly, but not as a blind merge. Int he past two merges I found code that was either malfunctioning or not doing what Aoyumi expected. <xiphmont> So, the code review aspect was helpful to us both. <xiphmont> That said, it's the only caveat; Aoyumi does good work and is happy to see us adopt it. <_Ivo> great to hear <xiphmont> that said, it's a taks that requires uninterrupted time, something I don't have alot of. Notice that <xiphmont> is a RedHat employee I think (the pulseaudio maintainer), but I don't think its fair to just reassign this to him, so I'm closing this with a resolution of upstream. Notice that I will not integrate these patches as is, quoting upstream on this: "I would like to do so, honestly, but not as a blind merge" |