Bug 2044187

Summary:	[Samba] Higher version of rhgs samba is required to avoid conflict with rhel-8.6 based samba version
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Vivek Das <vdas>
Component:	samba	Assignee:	Anoop C S <anoopcs>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Aditya Ramteke <aramteke>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rhgs-3.5	CC:	anoopcs, aramteke, gdeschner, nyancey, rcyriac, rhs-smb
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	ZStream
Target Release:	RHGS 3.5.z Async Update
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libtalloc-2.3.3-2.el8rhgs, libtdb-1.4.4-2.el8rhgs, libtevent-0.11.0-1.el8rhgs, samba-4.15.5-100.el8rhgs	Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-05-10 04:16:02 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Vivek Das 2022-01-24 07:52:34 UTC

Description of problem:

With RHEL-8.6 samba version samba-4.15.3-0.el8 is getting shipped which is higher than rhgs samba - samba-4.14.5-204.el8rhgs. Once rhel-8.6 is GA-ed upgrade will fail for the rhgs customers having lower version of rhgs samba.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL - samba-4.15.3-0.el8
RHGS - samba-4.14.5-204.el8rhgs

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

RHEL-8.6 Planned for 10-May-2022
Need to address this in next RHGS batch update i.e 3.5.7 schedule for ~April 2022.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-10 04:16:02 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: samba security, bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1756