Bug 2046186
Summary: | A TODO text block in the API browser | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | RY <ryasharz> | ||||
Component: | ocs-operator | Assignee: | Nitin Goyal <nigoyal> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Amrita Mahapatra <ammahapa> | ||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | 4.10 | CC: | aos-bugs, jarrpa, madam, muagarwa, nberry, ocs-bugs, odf-bz-bot, sostapov, spadgett | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | ODF 4.10.0 | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | 4.10.0-132 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2022-04-13 18:51:56 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
So Im debating if this really is an bug, since the TODO is in comments. @Sam any thoughts? I would transition this bug to ODF so that they can remove the TODO from the Godoc. Console is working correctly. They've simply included the TODO in their doc comment :) Based on the conversation to odf-operator Moving it to the ocs-operator as it is storageCluster API Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.10.0 enhancement, security & bug fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1372 |
Created attachment 1855493 [details] A TODO section in the docs block Description of problem: Seem like some of the API comments from the code are leaked to the API browser. (see attachment)