Bug 2047519

Summary: Linux audit-testsuite: signal/test 5, 8 failed on RHEL9 Kernel
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Dennis(Zhuoheng) Li <denli>
Component: kernelAssignee: Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs>
kernel sub component: Audit QA Contact: Dennis(Zhuoheng) Li <denli>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX Docs Contact:
Severity: unspecified    
Priority: unspecified CC: lilu, rbriggs
Version: 9.0   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-07-28 07:28:13 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2091421, 2144442    

Description Dennis(Zhuoheng) Li 2022-01-28 00:45:48 UTC
Description of problem:
signal/test 5, 8 failed on RHEL9 kernel


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Upstream test commit: 
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-testsuite/commit/1e2c58c5c2e0f3c756f1a7f02895b9d33ebda300
kernel Version: kernel-5.14.0-42.el9

How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Provision RHEL9 machines 
2. Run upstream audit test 
3.

Actual results:

Test Summary Report
-------------------
signal/test                        (Wstat: 0 Tests: 8 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  5, 8
Files=19, Tests=210, 29 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr  0.02 sys +  1.27 cusr  0.86 csys =  2.22 CPU)
Result: FAIL


Expected results:
Audit test pass


Additional info:
Beaker url for failed test: https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/6220121

Comment 2 Richard Guy Briggs 2022-01-28 19:59:40 UTC
(In reply to Dennis(Zhuoheng) Li from comment #0)
> signal/test                        (Wstat: 0 Tests: 8 Failed: 2)
>   Failed tests:  5, 8

Discovered several days prior.  Posted fix upstream:

https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-testsuite/pull/106

Comment 3 Dennis(Zhuoheng) Li 2022-03-22 18:35:24 UTC
Hi Richard,

I saw the pull request is pending review on upstream repo since Feb 9th. Is there any update on it?

Thanks!

Comment 4 Richard Guy Briggs 2022-04-01 02:26:21 UTC
(In reply to Dennis(Zhuoheng) Li from comment #3)
> I saw the pull request is pending review on upstream repo since Feb 9th. Is there any update on it?

Ask the upstream maintainer or use my branch.

Comment 8 RHEL Program Management 2023-07-28 07:28:13 UTC
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.