Bug 2047883

Summary:	Please branch and build python-stack-data in epel9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Michel Lind <michel>
Component:	python-stack-data	Assignee:	Michel Lind <michel>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	lbalhar, torsava
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	python-stack-data-0.5.0-1.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-09-01 10:02:45 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2049837, 2049855, 2049858, 2049861
Bug Blocks:	2047823

Description Michel Lind 2022-01-28 19:19:11 UTC

Please branch and build python-stack-data in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain python-stack-data in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-stack-data/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma).

Comment 1 Lumír Balhar 2022-01-31 08:18:40 UTC

Hi Michel. You are now a co-maintainer of the package and epel-packagers-sig has commit rights for all epel branches. Unfortunately, I don't have free cycles for packages in epel.

Comment 2 Michel Lind 2022-02-02 15:48:43 UTC

(In reply to Lumír Balhar from comment #1)
> Hi Michel. You are now a co-maintainer of the package and epel-packagers-sig
> has commit rights for all epel branches. Unfortunately, I don't have free
> cycles for packages in epel.

Hi Lumír,

Thanks!

❯ fedpkg request-branch --repo python-stack-data epel9
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41702

Comment 3 Michel Lind 2022-02-02 18:56:34 UTC

(In reply to Lumír Balhar from comment #1)
> Hi Michel. You are now a co-maintainer of the package and epel-packagers-sig
> has commit rights for all epel branches. Unfortunately, I don't have free
> cycles for packages in epel.

I put up https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-stack-data/pull-request/2 to disable typeguard, since it's not recommended to run linters on our packages anyway.

Let me know if there's any objection to having this in rawhide, or if you have any suggested changes; otherwise, I'll land this next week (or if we definitely don't want this in rawhide, I can keep it EPEL9 only - but I prefer to not make the branches diverge). No rush, there are other dependencies I need to branch first anyway.

Thanks!

Comment 4 Lumír Balhar 2022-02-04 16:11:46 UTC

Mentioned PR approved.

Comment 5 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 20:16:11 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 6 Michel Lind 2022-08-04 20:09:53 UTC

Neglected to follow up here for the past few months, let me see if I can chase the remaining dependencies

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-09-01 02:49:00 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e85e6e0395 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e85e6e0395

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-09-01 10:02:45 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e85e6e0395 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.