Bug 2049442
| Summary: | PMD cores running in kernel space for OVN-DPDK RHOSP16.2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Fast Datapath | Reporter: | rohit londhe <rlondhe> |
| Component: | openvswitch2.15 | Assignee: | Eelco Chaudron <echaudro> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | ovs-qe |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | RHEL 8.0 | CC: | atheurer, averdagu, cfields, cfontain, ctrautma, dan, dmarchan, echaudro, fbaudin, fleitner, gkadam, hakhande, hewang, jamsmith, jhsiao, jmarti, ldenny, mburns, parthee, ralongi, rjarry, schhabdi, sukar, supadhya, visinha |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-07-03 12:00:24 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
rohit londhe
2022-02-02 09:53:38 UTC
(In reply to Sanjay Upadhyay from comment #31) > (In reply to rohit londhe from comment #30) > > (In reply to Sanjay Upadhyay from comment #27) > > > (In reply to Chris Fields from comment #26) > > > > Customer said this in the support case: > > > > > > > > I don't know of anything QE is doing for this bug. Sanjay, do you know of > > > > anything? > > > > > > No, we are not doing anything, unless there is a direction we should test. > > > AFAIK our testing with OVN DPDK, our performance results with latest 16.1 > > > compose RHOS-16.1-RHEL-8-20220315 are normal 1.4 mpps on DPDK geneve tunnel. > > > > For which frame size RHQE is seeing 1.4 mpps ? > > Hi Rohit, > > We use 64 byte packets. The DUT is a DPDK binded to single nic. I noticed > our DPDK tests are over a single nic and we have not tested performance over > a DPDK bond. > performance test done on the NFV side was proposed long back and may need to > be updated. (In reply to Sanjay Upadhyay from comment #29) > > > We run both balance-slb and balance-tcp on OVN deploymens. Both the bonds > > are ovs_dpdk_bond over ovs_user_bridge. > > this is only functional tests, and our DUT is not the bonded bridges. Customer is using frame sizes 512 bytes and above, Any thoughts on throughput performance? |