Bug 2049885

Summary:	Please branch and build openconnect in epel9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Troy Dawson <tdawson>
Component:	openconnect	Assignee:	Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n.mavrogiannopoulos>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	dwmw2, n.mavrogiannopoulos
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	openconnect-8.10-8.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-02-20 00:28:03 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Troy Dawson 2022-02-02 20:37:37 UTC

Please branch and build openconnect in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain openconnect in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package. (FAS ID: tdawson)

Comment 1 Troy Dawson 2022-02-08 19:14:13 UTC

Any progress on openconnect?
All the dependencies are not in epel9 yet, but if you just change the conditional for epel8 to epel8 and above, it builds fine.

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 %endif
 
 # RHEL8 does not have libpskc, softhsm, ocserv yet
-%if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} == 8
+%if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} >= 8
 %define use_tokens 0
 %define use_ocserv 0
 %define use_softhsm 0


I'm also working on getting stoken, ocserv and radcli into epel9 as well.
This will allow us to change that back to just rhel8 in the conditional.

Fun thing though.  ocserv requires openconnect, so it's a circular dependency.
So, if we change that conditional and do a build in epel9, we'll be able to build ocserv.

If you want to just give me commit access to the package, I'll get all that worked out.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openconnect/adduser

Comment 2 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos 2022-02-08 19:20:44 UTC

Hi Troy,
 This has fallen through the cracks for me. I intend to do it some time in the future. I've given you access if you can bring it sooner.

Comment 3 Troy Dawson 2022-02-08 19:36:22 UTC

Thank You.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2022-02-08 20:46:51 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a73327f743 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a73327f743

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-02-09 01:48:24 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a73327f743 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a73327f743

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-02-12 01:26:59 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d74411c4ec has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d74411c4ec

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-02-20 00:28:03 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d74411c4ec has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.