Bug 205065
Summary: | Upgrade libsexy to 0.1.9 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alex Lancaster <alex> |
Component: | libsexy | Assignee: | Brian Pepple <bdpepple> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | extras-qa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://releases.chipx86.com/libsexy/libsexy/libsexy-0.1.9.tar.gz | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-09-03 14:59:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Alex Lancaster
2006-09-03 11:24:22 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > libsexy-0.1.9-1.fc5 Current version is libsexy-0.1.8-1.fc5 Pushed for FC6. (In reply to comment #2) > Pushed for FC6. Can you do an update for FC-5 as well, once the FC-6 build has gone through? It will be awhile, since I want to make sure it's stable before upgrading FC5. |