Bug 2051109
Summary: | mariadb logrotate script / missing delaycompress, sharedscripts options | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Leon Fauster <leonfauster> |
Component: | mariadb-10.3-module | Assignee: | Zuzana Miklankova <zmiklank> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Jakub Heger <jheger> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 8.5 | CC: | databases-maint, ljavorsk, mschorm |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-02-07 10:05:37 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Leon Fauster
2022-02-06 11:16:45 UTC
Hello, we are currently working on a fix for a very similar report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2015580 A likely fix we are testing at this moment, is the addition of the 'delaycompress' directive. Even though you also list the 'sharedscripts' directive, I don't believe it is necessary. Could you please explain further the necessity of the 'sharedscripts' directive in your specific case please ? The suggestion is mainly inspired from https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mariadb/blob/main/f/mariadb-logrotate.patch And the Fedora code is inspired by the upstream suggestion: https://mariadb.com/kb/en/rotating-logs-on-unix-and-linux/#configuring-logrotate The Fedora serves as a fine upstream for the future RHEL releases. This Fedora code has been synced to RHEL 9: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/mariadb/-/blob/c9s/mariadb-logrotate.patch However in stable RHEL releases our goal is to preserve the stability and keep the changes minimal, so we won't add unnecessary directives. -- Plese follow the BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2015580 to watch for progress on this issue. I believe the 'delaycompress' directive will be sufficient solution to your problem. Thank you for the report ! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2015580 *** |