Bug 2051190

Summary:	octave fails to build with java-17-openjdk
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	jiri vanek <jvanek>
Component:	octave	Assignee:	Orion Poplawski <orion>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	alex, cbm, didiksupriadi41, jaromir.capik, java-maint-sig, jhuttana, jvanek, orion, pmikova, rakesh.pandit, scitech-bugs, sgehwolf, susi.lehtola
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	octave-6.4.0-5.fc36	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-02-07 14:38:40 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2024265

Description jiri vanek 2022-02-06 15:22:16 UTC

octave fails to build with java-17-openjdk as sytem JDK. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17 .
See especially part about known failures: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions

For the build logs, see: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82432431
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/2590/82432590/mock_output.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/2590/82432590/hw_info.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/2590/82432590/state.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/2590/82432590/build.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/2590/82432590/root.log
We run the rebuild in side tag f36-java17, but as fail ratio was small, we expect this side tag to be merged into rawhide 7 or 8 of February 2022.
To reproduce before this date simply: fedpkg clone octave; cd octave;  fedpkg build --target f36-java17; #The target is crucial.
After this date the usual fedpkg build in f36 and up should do.

We run two reruns your package failed both.

We had also run the mass rebuilds in copr since November. We keep all encountered failures. See them here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java17//package/octave
You may find interesting additional informations here. Also we were spamming maintainers regualrly, check you spam folder.
              

We had tried aprox 500 packages, and aprox 65 had failed, so the java-17-openjdk will be system JDK in f36, and you should fix your package if you want to keep it alive. Usually the fix is simple, and best is to update the package to latest upstream version.
There will be usual mass rebuild once f36 branches. You may got another FTBFS bug.
Let us know here if you have any questions, here in bug, or at java-devel.org .

We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side if needed.

Comment 1 jiri vanek 2022-02-06 15:58:19 UTC

...
rm -f liboctave/operators/mx-ui32nda-ui64.h-t liboctave/operators/mx-ui32nda-ui64.h && gawk -f ./liboctave/operators/mk-ops.awk -v build_file=mx-ui32nda-ui64.h liboctave/operators/mx-ops > liboctave/operators/mx-ui32nda-ui64.h-t && mv liboctave/operators/mx-ui32nda-ui64.h-t liboctave/operators/mx-ui32nda-ui64.h
rm -f liboctave/operators/mx-ui64nda-i8.h-t liboctave/operators/mx-ui64nda-i8.h && gawk -f ./liboctave/operators/mk-ops.awk -v build_file=mx-ui64nda-i8.h liboctave/operators/mx-ops > liboctave/operators/mx-ui64nda-i8.h-t && mv liboctave/operators/mx-ui64nda-i8.h-t liboctave/operators/mx-ui64nda-i8.h
RPM build errors:
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: *** [Makefile:3170: all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:2666: all] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:30632: libgnu/libgnu.la] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.wYL0v2 (%build)
    Macro expanded in comment on line 46: %{version}%{?rctag}.tar.lz
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.wYL0v2 (%build)
Child return code was: 1
EXCEPTION: [Error()]


looks like gcc12 issue, not java17