Bug 2052106

Summary: Add naming scheme for RHEL-9.0
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Michal Sekletar <msekleta>
Component: systemdAssignee: Jacek Migacz <jmigacz>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Frantisek Sumsal <fsumsal>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 9.0CC: dtardon, rskvaril, systemd-maint-list
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: systemd-250-4.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 2121144 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-17 15:57:38 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1941649, 2121144    

Description Michal Sekletar 2022-02-08 18:02:59 UTC
Description of problem:
In every minor release we need to introduce naming scheme version specific for given minor release. Hence we need to also add naming scheme for RHEL-9.0.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
systemd-250-3.el9

How reproducible:
deterministic

Steps to Reproduce:
1. man systemd.net-naming-scheme


Actual results:
No mention of RHEL specific naming schemes.
 
Expected results:
List of RHEL specific naming schemes should contains naming scheme for RHEL-9.0.

Additional info:
https://github.com/redhat-plumbers/systemd-rhel9/pull/68

Comment 2 Plumber Bot 2022-02-22 12:31:27 UTC
fix merged to github main branch -> https://github.com/redhat-plumbers/systemd-rhel9/pull/68

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-17 15:57:38 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (new packages: systemd), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:3979