Bug 205268
Summary: | iptables reporting useless errorcodes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Daniel Riek <riek> |
Component: | iptables | Assignee: | Thomas Woerner <twoerner> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | iptables-1.3.8-6.fc8 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-12-05 17:16:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 261481, 412441 |
Description
Daniel Riek
2006-09-05 17:48:20 UTC
What kind of hardware is this? x86_64: cpu family : 15 model : 43 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ stepping : 1 Still happens in RHEL 5.1 beta: kernel-xen-2.6.18-37.el5 iptables-1.3.5-1.2.1 Can yopu please verify this with the latest iptables-1.3.8 verison in rawhide? I do not get this cryptic error message. BTW: This message reflacts probably a kernel module problem. Related poor output (crappy error code, rather than a real error) from iptables-1.3.5-1.2.1 (RHEL5): # iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m udp -j ACCEPT iptables: Unknown error 4294967295 # iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m udp --dport 23 -j ACCEPT iptables: Unknown error 4294967295 The error is easy to observe in this format, but when looking at a long list of rules in /etc/sysconfig/iptables, it is not. The error is introduced by incomplete editing following copy/paste to duplicate similar rules, e.g. adding a copy of the rule for UDP in addition to TCP. I can move this into its own bug if needed, but makes sense to append it here, if it still occurs in the affected version. iptables-1.3.8-6.fc8 on x86-64 now reports: iptables: Invalid argument Not a bug anymore, but makes yo uthink about an RFE for meaningful error reporting in iptables. E.g. if you use a non-existing table, it should say so. Will file a separate bug for that. |