Bug 2052938
Summary: | Wrong total disk capacity and disk count reported for multipath devices in custom partitioning | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | Jiri Kortus <jikortus> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jan Stodola <jstodola> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | Sagar Dubewar <sdubewar> |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 9.0 | CC: | bugproxy, dhorak, huzhao, jikortus, jkonecny, jomiller, jstodola, pberanek, release-test-team-automation, rvykydal, sbarcomb, sdubewar, tstaudt, vponcova, vtrefny, xiachen |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | 9.0 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | anaconda-34.25.2.8-1.el9 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
.The installer now displays correct total disk space in Custom partitioning with multipath or DDF RAID devices
Previously, when Custom partitioning was selected in Installer on a system with a multipath or DDF RAID device, the total disk space was not reported correctly and member disk devices were listed as available for partitioning.
With this update, the Custom partitioning in Installer reports correct value for total disk space and only allows to use the DDF RAID or multipath device as a whole.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 2017432 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2023-05-09 07:35:38 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1875375 | ||
Deadline: | 2023-02-07 |
Description
Jiri Kortus
2022-02-10 10:07:46 UTC
Moving this back to Anaconda -- the underlying issue is still the same, Anaconda selects both the disks and the mpath device, the blivet fix only excludes the disks in blivet, the total size and selected disks needs to be fixed in the UI. Hi Thomas, adding the ibmconf group to this bug causes it to be private. I'm removing the group so that the bug stays public and visible to anyone. Thanks for understanding. (In reply to Jan Stodola from comment #4) > Hi Thomas, > adding the ibmconf group to this bug causes it to be private. I'm removing > the group so that the bug stays public and visible to anyone. Thanks for > understanding. Hi Jan, understood - my apologies, it became a kind of a reflex to set the group. ------- Comment From thorsten.diehl.com 2022-03-04 11:52 EDT------- Any updates here? The problem exists in the same way on RHEL9.0 Nightly 20220220 with python3-blivet-3.4.0-12.el9. (Only the issue with the /boot partiton is solved.) See also https://bugzilla.linux.ibm.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194985 Hello, this bug is planned to be fixed in RHEL-9.1. ------- Comment From thorsten.diehl.com 2022-08-23 07:56 EDT------- JFI and for reminder: This bus is not yet fixed in Nightly20220808. Jan, do you have an outlook? Thorsten, unfortunately we haven't fixed this bug in 9.1 due to it's low severity. I'm moving this bug to RHEL-9.2 planning. ------- Comment From thorsten.diehl.com 2022-08-24 03:56 EDT------- (In reply to comment #10) > Thorsten, unfortunately we haven't fixed this bug in 9.1 due to it's low > severity. I'm moving this bug to RHEL-9.2 planning. Hi Jan, thanks. While 9.1 might become used more widely, please consider to document this in RH customer portal (KB, errata, ...), but it's up to you. Hi Sagar, I've proposed a doc text for this bug to be documented as a known issue. Can you please check it and prepare it for the release notes? ------- Comment From thorsten.diehl.com 2023-01-17 11:24 EDT------- (In reply to comment #10) > Thorsten, unfortunately we haven't fixed this bug in 9.1 due to it's low > severity. I'm moving this bug to RHEL-9.2 planning. Hi Jan, do you know whether we can expect a code fix for that with RHEL9.2? Hi Thorsten, the bug is currently not expected to be fixed in RHEL-9.2. It turned out to be an easy fix and we will fix it in RHEL-9.2. PR: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/4524 ------- Comment From thorsten.diehl.com 2023-01-25 09:57 EDT------- Jan, that sounds good, thank you! ------- Comment From thorsten.diehl.com 2023-03-10 07:10 EDT------- Successfully verified on RHEL9.2-N20230220, which has anaconda-34.25.2.8-1.el9. Successfully verified on RHEL9.2-N20230305, which has anaconda-34.25.2.9-1.el9. Closing this bug. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (anaconda bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2223 |