Bug 205455
Summary: | RFE: Versioned Obsoletes for built-in perl modules | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nick Leverton <nick> |
Component: | perl | Assignee: | Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 8 | CC: | jpazdziora, perl-devel, tcallawa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-03-10 10:06:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nick Leverton
2006-09-06 14:05:39 UTC
This seems like a reasonable suggestion. Do we have some plan to do this for F9 / 5.10? Or is there some other plan to deal with modules included in the perl package? Some of the mentioned packages already are obsoleted in F-8 perl. I can add other to F-8 spec file. What for F-9 perl-5.10? Any thoughts? I'm not sure about this. If we add these Obsoletes, we'd want to also add the versioned Provides. The base perl package already provides versioned provides for everything inside of it (in perl(Foo::Bar) format), so we'd be adding a rather large set of duplicate Provides to the spec file. The only Obsolete entry in the rawhide perl spec is: Obsoletes: perl-File-Temp < 0.18 There are no other hardcoded Obsoletes, so you should not be hitting the problem you're describing. :) I see, so we can close it. |