Bug 2055537
Summary: | [virtiofs] support for remote POSIX locks | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | yalzhang <yalzhang> | |
Component: | virtiofsd | Assignee: | Sergio Lopez <slopezpa> | |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | xiagao | |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | unspecified | |||
Version: | 9.0 | CC: | coli, lizhu, slopezpa, smitterl, virt-maint, yafu | |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Reopened | |
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 2057882 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-08-05 07:47:03 UTC | Type: | Feature Request | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: |
Description
yalzhang@redhat.com
2022-02-17 07:52:29 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2055284 *** From the talk in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022710#c9 , it's a 'FutureFeature'. Feel free to correct me. Hi Sergio, do we plan to support remote POSIX locks in rhel 9.0? If it is a future feature and not in the 9.0 plan, we may need to do another direction: 1) to remove the compat argument '-o flock' when start virtiofsd process; 2) let virtiofsd works as qemu-virtiofsd to ignore it and to ahead to start the process anyway. As currently we have transfered from qemu-virtiofsd to virtifsd already(virtiofsd will be installed automatically instead of qemu-virtiofsd), and it caused the regression in comment 0. Please help to evaluate it, Thank you! I found the virtiofsd process is generated by libvirt, file Bug 2057882 on libvirt to track this regression issue. Libvirt can drop the '-o flock' option since it can not support. I'm closing this BZ as don't have plans for it in the short term. We'll keep track of the progress of this feature upstream: https://gitlab.com/virtio-fs/virtiofsd/-/issues/53 |