Bug 2056488

Summary: Paged search lookthroughlimit counter doesnt take read ahead into account
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: thierry bordaz <tbordaz>
Component: 389-ds-baseAssignee: thierry bordaz <tbordaz>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: RHDS QE <ds-qe-bugs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.5CC: bsmejkal, ds-qe-bugs, jachapma, ldap-maint, mmuehlfe, mreynolds, msauton, tbordaz, toneata
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Triaged, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 389-ds-1.4-8050020220221145951.4051e825 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2040162
: 2059893 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-03-03 10:35:53 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2040162    
Bug Blocks: 2059893    

Description thierry bordaz 2022-02-21 11:03:13 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2040162 +++

Description of problem:

backport into RHDS-11.4
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/4595  

Paged search lookthroughlimit counter doesnt take read ahead into account

Not in 389-ds-base-1.4.3.27-2.module+el8dsrv+12690+c6df6d1b nor the RHEL-8.5 rpm version

See possible impact of https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/4551 (page searches may impact others searches)


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHDS-11.4
389-ds-base-1.4.3.27-2.module+el8dsrv


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Jamie Chapman on 2022-01-20 17:21:03 UTC ---

@Marc Sauton

This commit has been backported to 389-ds-base-1.4.3 and 389-ds-base-1.4.4

--- Additional comment from Marc Sauton on 2022-02-03 00:40:21 UTC ---

Should be put it in RHEL-8 and RHDS-11 ?
( some customer would like this )
Comment 9 thierry bordaz 2022-03-03 10:35:53 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2059893 ***