Bug 2056671

Summary:	OCS provider server failed to `rook-ceph-mgr` pod in cluster scope
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation	Reporter:	Santosh Pillai <sapillai>
Component:	ocs-operator	Assignee:	Jose A. Rivera <jrivera>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Neha Berry <nberry>
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.10	CC:	madam, mmuench, ocs-bugs, odf-bz-bot, sostapov
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-02-28 13:18:46 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Santosh Pillai 2022-02-21 19:13:31 UTC

Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):

OCS Provider API server (with ocs-provider-server sa) fails to list `rook-ceph-mgr` pod with cluster scope.


Version of all relevant components (if applicable):


Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?


Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?


Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?


Can this issue reproducible?


Can this issue reproduce from the UI?


If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.


Actual results:OCS Provider API server (with ocs-provider-server sa) fails to list `rook-ceph-mgr` pod with cluster scope.


Expected results:OCS Provider API server (with ocs-provider-server sa) should list the mgr pod within the openshift-storage namespace.


Additional info:

Comment 3 Santosh Pillai 2022-02-28 13:18:46 UTC

This was fixed along with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056651 

Closing this issue.