Bug 2056818

Summary: [GSS][RADOS][RGW] Scrub errors (omap_digest_mismatch) on PGs of RGW metadata pools after upgrade to RHCS 5
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Karun Josy <kjosy>
Component: RADOSAssignee: Neha Ojha <nojha>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Tintu Mathew <tmathew>
Severity: high Docs Contact: Mary Frances Hull <mhull>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.0CC: akupczyk, amathuri, assingh, bhubbard, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, choffman, gjose, gsitlani, ksirivad, lflores, lithomas, mhackett, mhull, mmuench, ngangadh, nojha, nravinas, pdhange, rfriedma, rmandyam, rzarzyns, sseshasa, tmathew, tpetr, tserlin, vumrao
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 5.1z1   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-16.2.7-103.el8cp Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Replicated pools do not result in inconsistent placement groups (PGs) Before this update, partial recovery did not set `clean_omap` to `false` for `CEPH_OSD_OP_OMAPRMKEYRANGE` operations. This caused replicated pools with inconsistent PGs due to incomplete omap recovery. With this release, marking `omap` as `dirty` for all omap writer operations, including `CEPH_OSD_OP_OMAPRMKEYRANGE`, results in no inconsistent PGs due to incomplete recovery.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-18 10:38:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2085458    

Comment 61 Neha Ojha 2022-05-17 19:46:11 UTC
Hi Ranjini and Mary,

Apologies for the delay. I have updated the doc text for this BZ.

Thanks,
Neha

Comment 62 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-18 10:38:15 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.1 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:4622