Bug 205683

Summary:	Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Christian Iseli <Christian.Iseli>
Component:	printman	Assignee:	Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Status:	CLOSED CANTFIX	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-09-08 08:34:05 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Christian Iseli 2006-09-07 22:54:44 UTC

After some discussion on IRC, it was agreed that the scrollkeeper package
should be the one owning /usr/share/omf.  Since the scrollkeeper package has
now been fixed to properly own that directory, please un-own it in your
package.

Please have a look at
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg00154.html
for further info/explanations.

Thanks!

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2006-09-08 08:34:05 UTC

Which package?  printman hasn't been shipped since FC2.

Comment 2 Christian Iseli 2006-09-08 08:51:25 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> Which package?  printman hasn't been shipped since FC2.

I see.

It's still in CVS devel, so I got confused when hunting affected packages.

In Extras, we have a convention to mark dead packages by "cvs rm"'ing the files
and just leaving a dead.package file in there...  Dunno what you do in Core.