Bug 2057983

Summary:	[DDF] MCG for Quay: PV based on local storage class description might be misleading towards LSO
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation	Reporter:	Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component:	documentation	Assignee:	Anjana Suparna Sriram <asriram>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:	Elad <ebenahar>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.9	CC:	mmuench, odf-bz-bot, olakra
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2022-02-24 09:17:56 UTC

MCG for Quay: PV based on local storage class description might be misleading towards LSO

"local storage class" term, although not linked here with LSO might be misleading to possibly use a LSO backed storage class but gain the redundancy by the number of volumes specified. It should rather avoid the term "local" here and note that a redundant storage class needs to be used in favor of creating a resource for Quay that provides resiliency.

Reported by: matthiasmuench

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_data_foundation/4.9/html/managing_hybrid_and_multicloud_resources/adding-storage-resources-for-hybrid-or-multicloud_rhodf#annotations:6cd91756-a7f2-4b8a-a963-176d6beafde9