Bug 2058677

Summary: whereabouts IPAM CNI ip-reconciler cronjob specification requires hostnetwork, api-int lb usage & proper backoff
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Douglas Smith <dosmith>
Component: NetworkingAssignee: Douglas Smith <dosmith>
Networking sub component: multus QA Contact: Weibin Liang <weliang>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX Docs Contact:
Severity: high    
Priority: high CC: weliang
Version: 4.10   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.6.z   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2058675 Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-08-24 19:49:58 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2058675    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Douglas Smith 2022-02-25 15:22:08 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2058675 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2058674 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2058673 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2058672 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2058671 +++

Description of problem: A number of changes related to the ip-reconciler ( need to be properly implemented, these include:

Impact: Without the proper backoff and replacement policies, many failed jobs can build up. Additionally without hostnetworking and use of the api-int lb network connectivity problems which cause errors.

Note: A set of changes to the ip-reconciler itself

Fixes to include in this (and subsequent backports) include:

* auto clean failed jobs (https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1318)
* Use host network and api-int (https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1302)
* Disable retries on failure (https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1290)

Comment 1 Scott Dodson 2022-08-24 19:49:58 UTC
The only open case attached to the chain of bugs back to 4.11 is against 4.8. It does not appear that anyone is awaiting fixes for this in 4.6.