Bug 2058716

Summary: [4.10] Alibaba Disk CSI Driver does not have CI
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Jan Safranek <jsafrane>
Component: StorageAssignee: Jan Safranek <jsafrane>
Storage sub component: Operators QA Contact: Wei Duan <wduan>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA Docs Contact:
Severity: high    
Priority: unspecified CC: aos-bugs, wduan
Version: 4.10   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.10.z   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2048955 Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-03-21 12:40:07 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2048955    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Jan Safranek 2022-02-25 17:08:03 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2048955 +++

There is no CI job for Alibaba Disk CSI driver + operator. Generic installation of OCP on Alibaba was added recently, we can add CSI driver tests.

Comment 2 Jan Safranek 2022-03-01 08:29:25 UTC
Waiting for https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/26583

Comment 4 Jan Safranek 2022-03-14 11:22:30 UTC
https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/26583 got merged. Pull requests in 4.10 branches in alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator and alibaba-cloud-csi-driver repos now have CI.

Comment 5 Jan Safranek 2022-03-14 11:22:53 UTC
I'm also adding periodic jobs to 4.10 and 4.11, https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/26954

Comment 8 Wei Duan 2022-03-16 07:53:00 UTC
Verified passed.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2022-03-21 12:40:07 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.5 bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:0928