Bug 2059242
| Summary: | [RFE] coredumpctl should trigger sosreport generation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | Piyush Bhoot <pbhoot> |
| Component: | sos | Assignee: | Pavel Moravec <pmoravec> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Supportability QE <supportability-qe> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 9.0 | CC: | agk, cww, dtardon, fkrska, jcastillo, msekleta, plambri, sbradley, systemd-maint-list, theute |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | pmoravec:
needinfo?
(cww) |
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Story | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Comment 5
Lukáš Nykrýn
2023-08-03 14:00:09 UTC
sos is a debugging tool, not monitoring. Also, the configuration/feature "let sos report is generated on a coredump" should be configurable; default installation of sos package should not set that up. So, *how* sos can contain or deliver this feature? I am rather for writing a KCS solution to let customers to create that service unit (and optionally configure the sos report args per their needs). cww, what do you think? (In reply to Pavel Moravec from comment #6) > sos is a debugging tool, not monitoring. > > Also, the configuration/feature "let sos report is generated on a coredump" > should be configurable; default installation of sos package should not set > that up. So, *how* sos can contain or deliver this feature? Those unit files can be disabled by default. And in KB we could just write "call systemctl enable sos-on-core.path " > > I am rather for writing a KCS solution to let customers to create that > service unit (and optionally configure the sos report args per their needs). > Yep, that would work as well, those two unit files are super simple. |