Bug 206039
Summary: | Error when partitioning disks for LVM | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Aleksandar Milivojevic <alex> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Chris Lumens <clumens> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | beta2 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-12-23 00:11:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Aleksandar Milivojevic
2006-09-11 17:20:12 UTC
It's because of your /srv partition being specified as 1 MB, even though you say to grow. If you increase the minimum size there then everything should be fine. We should be handling this better in the next release, though. Thanks for the quick answer. If I got you right, the problem is that Anaconda was doing the check on the size given in argument of --size option, instead of checking what would be the actuall partition size? Strange thing is that --size 1 --grow works on RHEL4 and FC5. Could it be that Anaconda in RHEL4 and FC5 is not doing this check at all? Right, this check is a new thing. I've been trying to make kickstart error messages more useful and this is an instance of one of those. Unfortunately, I wasn't taking the --grow option into account here so it's just a comparison between the PE size and the size specified for the logical volume. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for inclusion. I've retested with RHEL5 beta 2 and it seems that the issue is resolved. A package has been built which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of CURRENTRELEASE. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. |