Bug 206096
Summary: | Downloading File(s) From Apache Directory Listing CIFS Share Mounted In /var/www/html Always Stops at 33.9KB | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ryan Wagoner <ryan> | ||||
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Jeff Layton <jlayton> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 5 | CC: | cebbert, davej, smfrench, steved, wtogami | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-01-15 11:45:47 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Ryan Wagoner
2006-09-12 01:39:00 UTC
I did some additional testing on FC4. Reguardless if I mount the share CIFS or SMBFS in the /var/www/html/share folder I can browse the apache directory listing remotely and download the file. This is Apache version 2.0.54 on FC4. What I am going to try next is to install the FC5 rpm for apache 2.2.2 on FC4 and see if I can still download the file. If not then it appears the bug is in Apache. Try adding to httpd.conf: EnableSendfile off EnableMMap off Problem resolved!!! I would have never found those by myself. I read up on those commands and probably should've been using them all along. I googled my problem before posting this bug report, but couldn't find anybody with the same issue. Thanks alot and sorry for posting a useless bug report. This is a bug in the sendfile support in kernel cifs fs. A new kernel update has been released (Version: 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5) based upon a new upstream kernel release. Please retest against this new kernel, as a large number of patches go into each upstream release, possibly including changes that may address this problem. This bug has been placed in NEEDINFO state. Due to the large volume of inactive bugs in bugzilla, if this bug is still in this state in two weeks time, it will be closed. Should this bug still be relevant after this period, the reporter can reopen the bug at any time. Any other users on the Cc: list of this bug can request that the bug be reopened by adding a comment to the bug. In the last few updates, some users upgrading from FC4->FC5 have reported that installing a kernel update has left their systems unbootable. If you have been affected by this problem please check you only have one version of device-mapper & lvm2 installed. See bug 207474 for further details. If this bug is a problem preventing you from installing the release this version is filed against, please see bug 169613. If this bug has been fixed, but you are now experiencing a different problem, please file a separate bug for the new problem. Thank you. I updated to the 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 kernel version and restarted the box. Commented out the EnableSendfile off and EnableMMap off lines and restarted httpd. Problem still exists. File transfer stop at 33.9KB. Uncommented the lines, restarted httpd, and the problem goes away. Any chance you could attach or send a network capture of this ie an ethereal trace (since it appears to be a small amount of data sent before the failure). Yeah I can get an ethereal trace. Not only does the new kernel have the same problem with the file transfers stopping at 33.9KB, but now I can't even browse a directoy with more than 100 or so files in a apache directory listing or at the console with ls in a CIFS network share. Should I report this as a new bug in the 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 kernel? One other thing that could help that is easy (while I struggle to reserve one of our fc5 test machines long enough to upgrade to this particular version of kernel) would be to get the dmesg output from this (if it is a short enough scenario as it seems to be if only 33.9KB is transferred). "echo 1 > /proc/fs/cifs/cifsFYI" as late as possible before the failure, and then attach the data returned by "dmesg" (or equivalent) By the way it looks like the new FC5 kernel is easily at recent enough level of cifs, cifs 1.45, but probably does not have a key unlock fix which fixes a problem introduced on unlock (to Windows servers which is why I mention it here) by 2.6.18 posix locking code. See http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6b70c9559bcf381a6521e38b0dd5d3d4d905868a but seems unlikely to relate to write and our other tests (not including sendfile test unfortunately) against Windows 2003 did not show such an error (we have transferred many orders of magnitude larger files in our testing to Windows 2003 from cifs) - perhaps this is related to something sendfile unique. The readdir (ls) issue is also new and we are looking into trying to reproduce that but the same considerations apply (ethereal trace would be great, dmesg output would also be helpful as we narrow this down). Thanks. Created attachment 138749 [details]
cifs dmesg output
I attached the dmesg output. Where am I suspossed to run the ethereal trace? Between the fedora server and windows server? I also filled a bug report on the ls issue yesterday. Are you saying that the unlock issue was introduced in the 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 and wasn't around in the previous 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5 kernel. As when I updated thats when the problem occured with the ls command. The ls issue is also present in the latest Fedora Core 6 Test 3 and Developemnt releases. This is a showstopper for the latest FC5 kernel and FC6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211070 the unlock issue does not appear to be the problem here, but in any case is fixed in 2.6.19 (the bug was introduced with the change that enabled much better posix locking emulation to windows in 2.6.18). I will request a push of that tiny patch up to the 2.6.18.point-release (it has already been sent to RedHat) The ethereal trace would be run on either the fedora server or the windows server whichever is easier for you. It is best if the capture is started just before the problem occurs if that is possible (so we don't have to wade through too much network trace data). Been a while since this BZ was touched. Is this still an issue on more recent kernels? Also, were you ever able to get the network traces that Steve requested? No response in several months. Closing this case with a resolution of INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Please reopen if you're still able to reproduce this and can provide the requested info. |