Bug 2063423
| Summary: | Please build portaudio for EPEL 9 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
| Component: | portaudio | Assignee: | Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel9 | CC: | brendan.jones.it, brunovern.a, guido.aulisi, hdegoede, kvolny, lemenkov, luya_tfz, matthias, michel, ngompa13, nphilipp, oget.fedora, pasik, uwe.klotz |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | portaudio-19-38.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-05-28 02:36:47 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2030919 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 1914423 | ||
|
Description
Robert Scheck
2022-03-12 12:40:04 UTC
I forgot I was the maintainer of this. ;) Can't build until jack is built. However, I can see there's some life in the project as they moved to github and made a release, so I'll update it in Fedora while waiting for deps to be built in EPEL9. Why is this filed with jack instead of portaudio? Also, wouldn't the jack implementation in RHEL 9 be sufficient anyway? (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2) > Why is this filed with jack instead of portaudio? Also, wouldn't the jack > implementation in RHEL 9 be sufficient anyway? An excellent question! I haven't noticed this was filed against the wrong component. Fixing. (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2) > Also, wouldn't the jack implementation in RHEL 9 be sufficient anyway? There's no jack in RHEL 9 as far as I can tell. There's only pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit{,-devel}. Is that what you mean? (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #4) > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2) > > Also, wouldn't the jack implementation in RHEL 9 be sufficient anyway? > > There's no jack in RHEL 9 as far as I can tell. > > There's only pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit{,-devel}. Is that what you > mean? Yes. Those packages provide the headers and libraries required to leverage PipeWire as a JACK implementation. (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2) > Why is this filed with jack instead of portaudio? Sorry, that's my mistake during filing. The issue also affects xournalpp package. Peter, any chance for portaudio for EPEL 9? Peter, please branch and build portaudio in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain portaudio in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/portaudio/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. *** Bug 2081890 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #9) > Peter, please branch and build portaudio in epel9. > > If you do not wish to maintain portaudio in epel9, or do not think you will > be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy > to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig > group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/portaudio/addgroup and > grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. Since Peter seems to be too busy to work on this I've added salimma (who requested access in bug 2081890) and the epel-packagers-sig) to the users/groups for this package now. This should allow you to request the branch and do the build yourselves. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f184358fe5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f184358fe5 FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f184358fe5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f184358fe5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f184358fe5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |