Bug 2063760
| Summary: | Please branch and build sundials in epel9. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Mark E. Fuller <mark.e.fuller> |
| Component: | sundials | Assignee: | Antonio T. sagitter <trpost> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel9 | CC: | orion, sffc11+redhat, trpost |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | sundials-5.8.0-15.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-03-12 00:55:09 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2063782, 2063783, 2092187 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Mark E. Fuller
2022-03-14 10:52:04 UTC
Duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044770 Will you be able to branch and build sundials in epel9? I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9 (FAS: fuller). Missing dependencies for building Sundials in EPEL9: DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'hdf5-mpich-devel' DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'hdf5-openmpi-devel' DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'hypre-mpich-devel' DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'hypre-openmpi-devel' DEBUG util.py:446: Package make-1:4.3-7.el9.x86_64 is already installed. DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'petsc-mpich-devel >= 3.10' DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'petsc-openmpi-devel >= 3.10' DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'rsh' DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'scalapack-mpich-devel' DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'scalapack-openmpi-devel' DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'suitesparse64-devel' DEBUG util.py:444: Not all dependencies satisfied The comment for adding BR rsh indicates that it was for EPEL7. I suspect it is not needed for EL8+. May also need to disable KLU support for EPEL9. *** Bug 2156966 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Hi! I just want to highlight two things: 1. I was able to build sundials from source only with packages from EPEL9. A quick spot-check on the list above in Comment 3 seems to show that some or all of these packages are now available in EPEL9. 2. KLU support is important because it is required for full functionality in GNU Octave. That is the reason I came to this ticket: I need to build GNU Octave, but sundials-devel is not in EPEL9. (In reply to sffc from comment #7) > Hi! I just want to highlight two things: > > 1. I was able to build sundials from source only with packages from EPEL9. A > quick spot-check on the list above in Comment 3 seems to show that some or > all of these packages are now available in EPEL9. Not all, i'm testing Sundials builds in EPEL9 before pushing it (and related dependencies) in the official EPEL9 repositories. > > 2. KLU support is important because it is required for full functionality in > GNU Octave. That is the reason I came to this ticket: I need to build GNU > Octave, but sundials-devel is not in EPEL9. There is a pending request for building 'suitesparse' in CentOS 9 stream: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092187 (In reply to Antonio T. sagitter from comment #8) > (In reply to sffc from comment #7) > > Hi! I just want to highlight two things: > > > > > 2. KLU support is important because it is required for full functionality in > > GNU Octave. That is the reason I came to this ticket: I need to build GNU > > Octave, but sundials-devel is not in EPEL9. > > There is a pending request for building 'suitesparse' in CentOS 9 stream: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092187 Currently, i'm disabling KLU support in EPEL9 because of rhbz#2092187, unless we want to build 'suitesparse' too in EPEL9. Is suitesparse already in EPEL9? https://pkgs.org/search/?q=suitesparse-devel https://centos.pkgs.org/9-stream/centos-crb-x86_64/suitesparse-devel-5.4.0-10.el9.i686.rpm.html (In reply to sffc from comment #10) > Is suitesparse already in EPEL9? > > https://pkgs.org/search/?q=suitesparse-devel > > https://centos.pkgs.org/9-stream/centos-crb-x86_64/suitesparse-devel-5.4.0- > 10.el9.i686.rpm.html Yes but not 'suitesparse64' I don't have the appetite at the moment to build suitesparse64 for EPEL. Apparently I'm hungrier now :). The suitesparse64* packages should shortly be in EPEL9 - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/suitesparse-epel-5.4.0-10.el9 FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4691fc52b1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4691fc52b1 FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4691fc52b1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4691fc52b1 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4691fc52b1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |