Bug 206532

Summary:	[RHEL5] Adding Hitachi SANRISE entries into SCSI white list
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	David Milburn <dmilburn>
Component:	kernel	Assignee:	Chip Coldwell <coldwell>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.0	CC:	coughlan, mchristi, tao
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	pm-20060927,pm-20060928
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-10-06 18:08:43 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	184165

Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2006-09-18 13:17:09 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 7 Tom Coughlan 2006-10-02 15:29:48 UTC

Chip, 

This request is a subset of BZ 208256. Please confirm that everything here is in
the patch proposed for that bug. (I notice that the entry for "HITACHI",
"DISK-SUBSYSTEM" is slightly different.) Adjust the patch if needed and close
this as a dup of 208256.

Tom

Comment 12 Chip Coldwell 2006-10-04 15:00:39 UTC

+	{"HITACHI", "DF400", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN},
+	{"HITACHI", "DF500", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN},
+	{"HITACHI", "DF600", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN},

don't need BLIST_LARGELUN flag iff scsi_version >= SCSI_3

-	{"HITACHI", "DISK-SUBSYSTEM", "*", BLIST_ATTACH_PQ3 | BLIST_SPARSELUN |
BLIST_LARGELUN},
+	{"HITACHI", "DISK-SUBSYSTEM", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN},

why drop the PQ=3 flag?

-	{"HITACHI", "OPEN-E", "*", BLIST_ATTACH_PQ3 | BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN},
+	{"HITACHI", "OPEN-", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN},

again, why drop the PQ=3 flag?

Comment 17 Chip Coldwell 2006-10-06 18:08:43 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 208256 ***