Bug 2066321
| Summary: | McAfee packages not detected properly by the RHEL7 rules [rhel-7.9.z] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Renaud Métrich <rmetrich> |
| Component: | scap-security-guide | Assignee: | Vojtech Polasek <vpolasek> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Milan Lysonek <mlysonek> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Jan Fiala <jafiala> |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 7.9 | CC: | ggasparb, jafiala, kpfleming, matyc, mhaicman, mlysonek, vpolasek, wsato |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged, ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | scap-security-guide-0.1.57-7.el7_9 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
.SSG correctly detects McAfee antivirus
Previously, the `package_mcafeetp_installed` rule in SCAP Security Guide (SSG) checked for the wrong name of the McAfee antivirus package. As a consequence, SSG did not detect the presence of the antivirus and the rule incorrectly reported `fail`. With this update, the name of the antivirus package has been corrected. As a result, the rule can now correctly detect the presence of the antivirus package and reports `pass` if McAfee antivirus is present.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-05-18 16:16:32 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Comment 5
Vojtech Polasek
2022-04-27 07:00:50 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (scap-security-guide bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:4647 |