Bug 2066514
| Summary: | OCS operator to install Ceph prometheus alerts instead of Rook | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Travis Nielsen <tnielsen> |
| Component: | ocs-operator | Assignee: | Travis Nielsen <tnielsen> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Martin Bukatovic <mbukatov> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.11 | CC: | akrai, fbalak, madam, mbukatov, mmuench, muagarwa, ocs-bugs, odf-bz-bot, sostapov |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | ODF 4.11.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 4.11.0-89 | Doc Type: | No Doc Update |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-08-24 13:49:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Travis Nielsen
2022-03-21 23:11:24 UTC
To finish the second bullet above... - The alerts will be customizable in the future by an OCP feature described in this enhancement: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/958 Customization upstream will be based on a helm chart post processor. Do I understand it right that unless QE needs to disable or tweak monitoring, the default behavior doesn't change, thus this is mostly regression testing (monitoring should still works as it did before)? Correct, a regression test will be sufficient since the alerts are expected to remain the same. Also if you could test during an upgrade from 4.10 --> 4.11 that the alerts are still preserved. The PrometheusRule CR created now by the OCS operator has a slightly different resource name (prometheus-ceph-rules) than the CR that had been created by rook. The rules CR previously had the major ceph version in the name (v14 or v16) that survived ODF upgrades, but I just want to confirm it's ok in this case as well, thanks. Thanks, so besides standard regression testing, we will also run alerting tests after an upgrade. Moving to verified based on test results of applicable alerting tests for ODF 4.11.0 RC3 build (run ID 1660738848). Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.11.0 security, enhancement, & bugfix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:6156 |