Bug 2066610

Summary:	Please branch and build netsniff-ng in epel9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Hangbin Liu <haliu>
Component:	netsniff-ng	Assignee:	Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	jaskalnik, jskarvad, jtfas90, mail
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	netsniff-ng-0.6.8-9.fc37 netsniff-ng-0.6.8-9.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-05-26 12:07:55 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2066787
Bug Blocks:

Description Hangbin Liu 2022-03-22 07:40:38 UTC

Please branch and build netsniff-ng in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain netsniff-ng in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS liuhangbin);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/netsniff-ng/adduser

Comment 1 Jaroslav Škarvada 2022-03-22 10:50:45 UTC

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43102

Comment 2 Jaroslav Škarvada 2022-03-22 13:42:08 UTC

GeoIP-devel is missing. I think I could compile netsniff-ng without it, but RHEL-8 had the support, thus RHEL-9 should also have it.

Comment 3 Jaroslav Škarvada 2022-03-22 13:45:51 UTC

(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2)
> GeoIP-devel is missing. I think I could compile netsniff-ng without it, but
> RHEL-8 had the support, thus RHEL-9 should also have it.

Bug 2066787.

Comment 4 Hangbin Liu 2022-03-25 09:13:55 UTC

(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2)
> GeoIP-devel is missing. I think I could compile netsniff-ng without it, but
> RHEL-8 had the support, thus RHEL-9 should also have it.

Hi Jaroslav,

Thanks for the update. I saw astraceroute, flowtop, and netsniff-ng could use GeoIP.
For myself, I mainly use mausezahn for network testing. So I'm OK to build it without GeoIP. It all depends on you.

Thanks
Hangbin

Comment 5 Hangbin Liu 2022-05-26 07:43:51 UTC

Hi Jaroslav， any update? Are you still waiting for GeoIP el9?

Comment 6 Jaroslav Škarvada 2022-05-26 11:42:27 UTC

(In reply to Hangbin Liu from comment #5)
> Hi Jaroslav， any update? Are you still waiting for GeoIP el9?

I will go without it. We can add it later.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-05-26 12:05:17 UTC

FEDORA-2022-92ec0f0d45 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-92ec0f0d45

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-05-26 12:07:55 UTC

FEDORA-2022-92ec0f0d45 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-05-26 12:19:40 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ada9f22888 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ada9f22888

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-05-27 01:50:50 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ada9f22888 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ada9f22888

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 11 Hangbin Liu 2022-05-31 03:04:56 UTC

Hi Jaroslav,

As I said in comment 4, the main reason I need netsniff-ng is using mausezahn for kernel selftests.
But I found the epel version of netsniff-ng do not have mausezahn...

I checked the reason and found you want to drop mausezahn in bug 1111779 due to conflicts. But this
conflict seems not exist now. At least I can't find mausezahn packet on recent fedora/rhel. So I think
we can build mausezahn back, as fedora version did.

To build mausezahn, we require libcli-devel. libcli do have elep9 branch, and I have asked libcli to branch epel8 version in bug 2091769.
Do you think I need to open a bug for netsniff-ng to enable mausezahn separtely?

Thanks
Hangbin

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2022-06-03 02:59:16 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ada9f22888 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 13 Jaroslav Škarvada 2022-06-06 20:11:21 UTC

(In reply to Hangbin Liu from comment #11)
> Hi Jaroslav,
> 
> As I said in comment 4, the main reason I need netsniff-ng is using
> mausezahn for kernel selftests.
> But I found the epel version of netsniff-ng do not have mausezahn...
> 
> I checked the reason and found you want to drop mausezahn in bug 1111779 due
> to conflicts. But this
> conflict seems not exist now. At least I can't find mausezahn packet on
> recent fedora/rhel. So I think
> we can build mausezahn back, as fedora version did.
> 
> To build mausezahn, we require libcli-devel. libcli do have elep9 branch,
> and I have asked libcli to branch epel8 version in bug 2091769.
> Do you think I need to open a bug for netsniff-ng to enable mausezahn
> separtely?
> 
> Thanks
> Hangbin

Yes, please open new bug.