Bug 2067109

Summary:	Rule ensure_redhat_gpgkey_installed fails on RHEL9 because of new auxiliary gpg key
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9	Reporter:	Gabriel Gaspar Becker <ggasparb>
Component:	scap-security-guide	Assignee:	Gabriel Gaspar Becker <ggasparb>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Milan Lysonek <mlysonek>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	9.0	CC:	ggasparb, mhaicman, mlysonek, openscap-maint, pvlasin, vpolasek
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	AutoVerified, Bugfix, Triaged
Target Release:	---	Flags:	pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	scap-security-guide-0.1.60-6.el9_0	Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	2068140 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-05-17 13:53:43 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2068140

Description Gabriel Gaspar Becker 2022-03-23 10:36:33 UTC

Description of problem:
A new auxiliary key has been generated for RHEL9 and rule ensure_redhat_gpgkey_installed is failing because it still uses the references of the older key.

The references must be updated to match the newer auxiliary key.

Comment 2 Gabriel Gaspar Becker 2022-03-23 10:41:39 UTC

Fixed upstream:
https://github.com/ComplianceAsCode/content/pull/8411

Comment 5 Gabriel Gaspar Becker 2022-03-24 10:58:57 UTC

C9S PR: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/scap-security-guide/-/merge_requests/20

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-17 13:53:43 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (new packages: scap-security-guide), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:2610