Bug 2067485

Summary: Please branch and build luajit in epel9
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Michel Lind <michel>
Component: luajitAssignee: Michel Lind <michel>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel9CC: asn, carl, igor.raits, jakub.ruzicka, oliver, sipoyare
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: luajit-2.1.0-0.23beta3.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-04-23 19:33:50 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2037936, 2044668, 2067491    

Description Michel Lind 2022-03-23 21:17:49 UTC
Please branch and build luajit in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain luajit in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luajit/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma).

Comment 1 Michel Lind 2022-03-23 21:28:26 UTC
Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84612493

Comment 2 Andreas Schneider 2022-03-24 18:37:38 UTC
I thought that if a package is in rhel, you are not allowed to package it in epel.

Comment 3 Michel Lind 2022-03-29 05:44:51 UTC
(In reply to Andreas Schneider from comment #2)
> I thought that if a package is in rhel, you are not allowed to package it in
> epel.

Ugh, good call. looks like it is in RHEL but not branched then:

```
~
⬢ [c9s:2022-03-06] ❯ sudo dnf search luajit
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:40 ago on Tue 29 Mar 2022 05:38:41 AM UTC.
No matches found.
```

I'll open a new bug for that.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2069528 ***

Comment 4 Michel Lind 2022-03-30 21:09:19 UTC
per @carl in the EPEL Steering Committee meeting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-03-30/epel.2022-03-30-20.00.log.html at 20:56:19 -- if the package is built in CentOS Stream but none of the subpackages are published in any repo, it is still eligible for EPEL

and `fedpkg request-branch` will fail if the package is not eligible anyway (I'm going to look at the code to see if we can add a dry-run mode so it can be used to check without actually creating a ticket)

Comment 5 Michel Lind 2022-03-30 21:15:09 UTC
meant to tag, not needinfo, Carl

Comment 6 Michel Lind 2022-03-30 22:26:17 UTC
Update: @

Comment 7 Michel Lind 2022-03-30 22:52:24 UTC
Update: this is now retired properly in Stream 9 anyway: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/luajit/-/blob/main/dead.package

Comment 8 Michel Lind 2022-04-13 20:46:51 UTC
Oliver, will you be able to branch and build luajit in epel9?
The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel9. Thanks!

Comment 9 Oliver Ilian 2022-04-14 07:05:37 UTC
Hi Michel.

unfortunately, I do not have the time at the moment to look into this and build luajit for epel9.

Sorry,
Oliver

Comment 10 Michel Lind 2022-04-14 18:43:28 UTC
(In reply to Oliver Ilian from comment #9)
> Hi Michel.
> 
> unfortunately, I do not have the time at the moment to look into this and
> build luajit for epel9.
> 
> Sorry,
> Oliver

Hi Oliver,

No worries. As I noted I'm more than happy to co-maintain and so is the EPEL Packagers SIG, but we do need to be added to the ACL

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luajit/adduser for salimma
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luajit/addgroup for epel-packagers-sig

Could you add us? also cc the other package admins

Comment 11 Michel Lind 2022-04-16 14:48:17 UTC
Igor granted access, thanks!

Comment 12 Michel Lind 2022-04-16 23:41:37 UTC
*** Bug 2070332 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 Michel Lind 2022-04-16 23:42:34 UTC
❯ fedpkg request-branch --repo luajit epel9
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43748

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2022-04-19 18:06:10 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a3367a878f has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a3367a878f

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2022-04-20 19:38:46 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a3367a878f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a3367a878f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2022-04-23 19:33:50 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a3367a878f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.