Bug 2070893
| Summary: | Non-responsive maintainer check for hno | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jonathan S. <js-fedora> |
| Component: | electrum | Assignee: | Henrik Nordström <henrik> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | henrik |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-04-13 02:08:10 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jonathan S.
2022-04-01 10:07:09 UTC
I am active. But undecided on if electrum is worth the effort to maintain within Fedora. Very often blocked by python dependencies, none of which is detected until runtime. Glad to hear back from you! If you're no longer interested in maintaining Electrum, I'm happy to do so. In any case, I'd *really* like to get Electrum updated before F36 hits final, as otherwise we'll ship a broken Electrum. Have granted you commit access to electrum. Note: The state "broken" is more of a rule than exeption for Electrum unfortunately, and it's also common that different fedora releases need different versions due to dependencies. Thank you for granting commit access! Can you also grant push access to me or someone else to have a backup? :) |