Bug 2072650

Summary:	Please branch and build adobe-source-code-pro-fonts in epel9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Davide Cavalca <davide>
Component:	adobe-source-code-pro-fonts	Assignee:	Matt Rose <mattrose>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	code, dofiy12982, fonts-bugs, mark, mattrose, pasik, petersen, redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	adobe-source-code-pro-fonts-2.030.1.050-12.el9.1	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-08-01 08:52:15 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1914423, 2072649

Description Davide Cavalca 2022-04-06 17:36:11 UTC

Please branch and build adobe-source-code-pro-fonts in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain adobe-source-code-pro-fonts in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/adobe-source-code-pro-fonts/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

Comment 1 Ben Beasley 2022-04-06 17:46:37 UTC

If I comment out the missing font dependencies (for testing purposes only), I get:

> No matching package to install: 'python3dist(typogrify)'

Would you care to file an EPEL9 request bug on python-typogrify too?

Comment 2 Ben Beasley 2022-04-06 17:47:23 UTC

(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #1)
> If I comment out the missing font dependencies (for testing purposes only),
> I get:
> 
> > No matching package to install: 'python3dist(typogrify)'
> 
> Would you care to file an EPEL9 request bug on python-typogrify too?

Sorry, this comment belonged on bug 2072649.

Comment 3 Davide Cavalca 2022-07-15 23:57:10 UTC

Will you be able to branch and build adobe-source-code-pro-fonts in epel9?
The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel9.

Comment 4 GD 2022-07-31 18:16:02 UTC

Any news on this?

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2022-08-01 08:52:15 UTC

It is being added to RHEL 9.1 AppStream.