Description of problem:
Based on the discussions in the BZ [1],
1. Make cephfs-top display scroll-able like top does. Enable Up/Down, PgUp/PgDn, Right/Left keys to display line-entries which are off the window. Zoom-in the cephfs-top display with 100+ clients (fill up the screen) to simulate this issue. At present, cephfs-top displays only the clients listed at the top (top-left) and there's no way to move down or sideways.
2. There is a related issue of cephfs-top shows blank screen when the number of clients exceeds 150 to 200 clients. Check and fix that too.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2067168
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHCS 5.0z4
How reproducible:
Mount more number of clients (100 clients) than the screen could accommodate and run cephfs-top.
Steps to Reproduce:
Same as above.
Actual results:
Can't scroll and see the clients which are off the window and great number of clients shows blank screen.
Expected results:
cephfs-top display should be scroll-able for great number of clients like top(1) does.
cephfs-top should display the clients (no blank screen) for great number of clients.
Additional info:
We've agreed to put this in 5.3. The trackers are a bit of a mess, I don't recall if we have a separate upstream PR resolving this issue or if it's pending on https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/46072
Comment 3Neeraj Pratap Singh
2022-07-19 03:53:02 UTC
(In reply to Greg Farnum from comment #2)
> We've agreed to put this in 5.3. The trackers are a bit of a mess, I don't
> recall if we have a separate upstream PR resolving this issue or if it's
> pending on https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/46072
We will be adding this feature as a separate PR.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.3 Bug fix and security update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:0980