Bug 2075212

Summary: [RFE] Dynamic Bucket Resharding(DBR) support in RGW Multisite
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Vikhyat Umrao <vumrao>
Component: RGW-MultisiteAssignee: Adam C. Emerson <aemerson>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Anuchaithra <anrao>
Severity: high Docs Contact: Eliska <ekristov>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.1CC: aemerson, anrao, ceph-eng-bugs, dwojewod, ekristov, pasik, tserlin, vereddy
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: 6.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-17.2.5-12.el9cp Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.Multi-site configuration supports dynamic bucket index resharding Previously, only manual resharding of the buckets for multi-site configurations was supported. With this release, dynamic bucket resharding is supported in multi-site configurations. Once the storage clusters are upgraded, enable the `resharding` feature and reshard the buckets either manually with `radogw-admin bucket reshard` command or automatically with dynamic resharding, independently of other zones in the storage cluster.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 2075214 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-03-20 18:56:27 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1831661, 2075214, 2126050    

Description Vikhyat Umrao 2022-04-13 20:03:35 UTC
Description of problem:
[RFE] Dynamic Bucket Resharding(DBR) support in RGW Multisite

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHCS 5.1

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2023-03-20 18:56:27 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 6.0 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:1360